- Introduction
- Generally, Austen isn't linked to awe, even though she has Romantic tendencies. However, I think there are real ways that Austen uses the characteristics of awe in her novel (maybe satirically, maybe not).
- My first post about awe in Austen
- Gothic/Sublime
- Northanger Abbey
- "riposte to magic and mystery"
- Literary analysis of primary text: Northanger Abbey
- Catherine's obsession with gothic architecture, scary stories, dark mysteries
- This is first and foremost a satire of gothic awe. How does this change the awe?
- Cara's post on gothic awe
- Surprise
- "The Illusionist"
- Subtopic: Spectacle
- Austen as magician, compared to Wizard of Oz
- Unfamiliar, unexpected appearances. The common place becoming the wonderful (realist as a magician)
- Enchantment built into novel: achieved through combination of wonder and irony
- "Aesthetics and Ethics of Surprise"
- A genuine source of awe in Austen
- Epiphany--moments caused by nature
- "Looking at the Landscape in Jane Austen"
- Austen uses Romantic ideal of Nature to create moments of epiphany
- Pride and Prejudice
- Epiphany at Pemberley after touring the grounds
- Emma
- Berry-picking party, Emma lashes out, realizes her love for Knightley, admires his property and grounds
- Persuasion
- Epiphany: long walk with everyone at the beginning
- First meeting in Bath, rain forces Anne inside, Wentworth is able to find her. She fully realizes her feelings
- Sense and Sensibility
- Marianne almost dying outside in the rain leads to an epiphany
- Are these epiphany moments genuine or satirical? Both?
- Connections?
- Satire contradicts awe, yet Austen uses both
- Is her awe genuine or satirical?
- Discussion of current state of Austen's work? (I might not actually include this at all)
- What have her works become?
- Has awe been lost or created?
Prospective Venue:
I am pretty sure this journal is my number one choice for a publishing venue. My paper will most likely look like a traditional scholarly article, and I think I actually have a small chance of being published here. As far as I can tell, it is the only journal completely dedicated to Jane Austen scholarship, and from my own research for this paper, they seem willing to publish a wide variety of papers. There is also an online version of this journal. It doesn't say anywhere on their website, but I think the online version publishes a lot more than the print journal. So, if they don't take my submission for their print journal, I can most likely get it published online. They only take submission up to 3500 words and I am a little bit worried about fitting my paper into such a small amount of space.
What's Next:
I have a few solid sources referring to suprise, and one good source about nature. I really need to start digging into Austen's texts and finding quotes and passages which prove my points. And really I just need to start writing. I think I have a developed enough outline that drafting is totally possible. I've cut down the content of my paper a lot; now I am doing more of a literary analysis that focuses on the different ways Austen uses awe. I'm not sure if I will even try to pull in very much about popular culture and the distortion of Austen's works. That is the theme of my creative project, however, so do I need to address it in my paper? Is the narrower focus of my paper beneficial?
No comments:
Post a Comment